Chinese and South Korean envoys are investment discussions in Washington with US officials on Beijing’s plans to restart talks among regional powers aimed at ending North Korea’s nuclear arms program. Following are questions about the talks, which also engage Russia and Japan, and whether the parties can press on with a plan to disarm the North. North Korea’s moves are often linked to the shaky state of its finances, and the economic pressure it is facing indicates its calls for the resumption of the talks are in the hope of winning aid. Washington this week imposed more sanction on the North in response to the sinking of a South Korean navy ship in March, which both the United States and the South blame on the North.
North Korea’s call for the resumption of the six-way talks came in July, when it escaped direct blame by the UN safety Council, a move seen as a way to put the incident behind it. But in doing so, it renewed a demand for divide talks on reaching a peace treaty with the United States, saying it wanted a formal end to the 1950-53 Korean War. Many in Seoul and Washington think the biggest inspiration for such a treaty is to remove US troops from the South. North Korea will be expected to resume where it left off when it step away from the deal two years ago. This means taking apart its Yongbyon plant that makes arms-score plutonium and allowing in international nuclear inspectors. it would not address the progress the North is believed to have made in uranium enrichment, which could provide it a second path to a bomb.
Pyongyang may seek a much bigger payoff for giving up its uranium ambition and this could bog down already sputtering negotiations for many more years. The talks are aimed at finish the North’s nuclear arms programme in return for aid and an end to its diplomatic isolation. Analysts suggest the most the talks might achieve would be for the North to give up Yongbyon entirely while it drags its feet on calls for it to give up uranium enrichment. An increasingly important anxiety for the United States has been to put the brakes on North Korea proliferating nuclear materials and technology to rogue states and entities.
North Korea’s call for the resumption of the six-way talks came in July, when it escaped direct blame by the UN safety Council, a move seen as a way to put the incident behind it. But in doing so, it renewed a demand for divide talks on reaching a peace treaty with the United States, saying it wanted a formal end to the 1950-53 Korean War. Many in Seoul and Washington think the biggest inspiration for such a treaty is to remove US troops from the South. North Korea will be expected to resume where it left off when it step away from the deal two years ago. This means taking apart its Yongbyon plant that makes arms-score plutonium and allowing in international nuclear inspectors. it would not address the progress the North is believed to have made in uranium enrichment, which could provide it a second path to a bomb.
Pyongyang may seek a much bigger payoff for giving up its uranium ambition and this could bog down already sputtering negotiations for many more years. The talks are aimed at finish the North’s nuclear arms programme in return for aid and an end to its diplomatic isolation. Analysts suggest the most the talks might achieve would be for the North to give up Yongbyon entirely while it drags its feet on calls for it to give up uranium enrichment. An increasingly important anxiety for the United States has been to put the brakes on North Korea proliferating nuclear materials and technology to rogue states and entities.
No comments:
Post a Comment